The Economy Is Not The Stock Market

Several days ago, the Commerce Department reported that May's factory orders had increased by a 2.9 percent. This was well covered by 'the press', as it was to be a positive influence on 'the market' (yes, the quotes are intentional.....you'll see why). The enthusiasm was understandable - the $394 billion in orders of manufactured goods is the highest level seen since the current calculation method was adopted. Although being skeptical can be wise, the figure was (and is) a clue that the economy is on a solid footing. However, too many times there's a disconnect between what 'should' be the result of a piece of economic data, and what actually occurs. The economy isn't the market. Investors can't buy shares in factory orders......they can only buy (or sell) stocks. Regardless of how strong or weak the economy is, one only makes money by buying low and selling high. So with that, we put together a study of some of the economic indicators that are treated as if they affect stocks, but really may not.

Gross Domestic Product

The chart below plots a monthly S&P 500 against a quarterly Gross Domestic Product growth figure. Keep in mind that we're comparing apples to oranges, at least to a small degree. The S&P index should generally go higher, while the GDP percentage growth rate should stay somewhere in between 0 and 5 percent. In other words, the two won't move in tandem. What we're trying to illustrate is the connection between good and bad economic data, and the stock market.

Take a look at the chart first, then read our thoughts immediately below that. By the way, the raw GDP figures are represented by the thin blue line. It's a little erratic, so to smooth it out, we've applied a 4 period (one year) moving average of the quarterly GDP figure - that's the red line.

S&P 500 (monthly) versus Gross Domestic Product change (quarterly) http://www.bluegrassportfolio.com/images/070705spvsgdp.gif

Generally speaking, the GDP figure was a pretty lousy tool, if you were using it to forecast stock market growth. In area 1, we see a major economic contraction in the early 90's. We saw the S&P 500 pull back by about 50 points during that period, although the dip actually occurred before the GDP news was released. Interestingly, that 'horrible' GDP figure led to a full market recovery, and then another 50 point rally before the uptrend was even tested. In area 2, a GDP that topped 6 percent in late 1999/early 2000 was going to usher in the new era of stock gains, right? Wrong! Stocks got crushed a few days later....and kept getting crushed for more than a year. In area 3, the fallout from the bear market meant a negative growth rate by the end of 2001. That could persist for years, right? Wrong again. The market hit a bottom just after that, and we're well off the lows that occurred in the shadow of that economic contraction.

The point is, just because the media says something doesn't make it true. It might matter for a few minutes, which is great for short-term trades. But it would be inaccurate to say that it even matters in terms of days, and it certainly can't matter for long-term charts. If anything, the GDP figure could be used as a contrarian indicator.....at least when it hits its extremes. This is why more and more folks are abandoning traditional logic when it comes to their portfolios. Paying attention solely to charts is not without its flaws, but technical analysis would have gotten you out of the market in early 2000, and back into the market in 2003. The ultimate economic indicator (GDP) would have been well behind the market trend in most cases.

Unemployment

Let's look at another well covered economic indicator......unemployment. This data is released monthly, instead of quarterly. But like the GDP data, it's a percentage that will fluctuate (between 3 and 8). Again, we're not going to look for the market to mirror the unemployment figure. We just want to see if there's a correlation between employment and the stock market. Like above, the S&P 500 appears above, while the unemployment rate is in blue. Take a look, then read below for our thoughts here.

S&P 500 (monthly) versus Unemployment rate (monthly) http://www.bluegrassportfolio.com/images/070705spvsunemp.gif

See anything familiar? Employment was at it strongest in area 2, right before stocks nose-dived. Employment was at its recent worst in area 3, right as the market ended the bear market. I highlighted a high and low unemployment range in area 1, only because neither seemed to affect the market during that period. Like the GDP figure, unemployment data is almost better suited to be a contrarian indicator. There is one thing worth mentioning, though, that is evident with this chart. While the unemployment rates at the 'extreme' ends of spectrum was often a sign of a reversals, there is a nice correlation between the direction of the unemployment line and the direction of the market. The two typically move in opposite directions, regardless of what the current unemployment level is. In that sense, logic has at least a small role.

Bottom Line

Maybe you're wondering why all the chatter about economic data in the first place. The answer is, simply to highlight the reality that the economy isn't the market. Too many investors assume there's a certain cause-and-effect relationship between one and the other. There's a relationship, but it's usually not the one that seems most reasonable. Hopefully the graphs above have helped make that point. That's why we focus so much on charts, and are increasingly hesitant to incorporate economic data in the traditional way. Just something to think about the next time you're tempted to respond to economic news.

James Brumley is the chief analyst at Bluegrass Portfolio Management. After spending time as a broker, he established an independent investment research firm. He now manages portfolios, and you'll find his market commentary and analysis on several financial websites. See all of his analysis at http://bluegrassportfolio.com/

Latest News

guardian.co.uk

Microsoft's Ballmer to CES: keep investing in tech despite ... Scientific American - 10 hours ago Las Vegas , NEV. -- In his first ever CES keynote, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer yesterday acknowledged the tough economic times, but urged companies not to ... Microsoft: the year ahead ComputerWeekly.com Microsoft releases Windows Server 2008 R2 beta VNUNet.com Windows 7 beta available worldwide on Friday AFP TechFlash - G4 TV all 1,247 news articles

The Money Times

The Best Investment Values in a Decade Motley Fool - 9 hours ago These days, we're presented with what Ron Muhlenkamp a few months ago called "the best investment values we've seen in a decade." Obviously, the market has ... You Are About to Make a Bad Investment Motley Fool The Flight to Safety Could Burn You Motley Fool Wednesday's Biggest Stock Stars Motley Fool Motley Fool - Motley Fool all 146 news articles

Wealth Bulletin

How to avoid a Madoff fund San Francisco Chronicle,  USA - 1 hour ago Feeder-funds (hedge funds or funds that do all their investing through another fund) and funds-of- funds sold investment services to individuals, ... The Financial Services Industry’s Free Lunch Asia Sentinel Fund-of-Hedge Funds Lacked Technology to Avoid Madoff Losses Advanced Trading D Bank declined offers to invest with Madoff Financial Times all 13 news articles

Dividend.com

Billionaire investor places next supermarket bet MarketWatch - 5 hours ago Yucaipa's investment funds have been aggressive buyers of Whole Foods shares since Nov. 24, spending a net $98 million to amass the stake. ... Activist shareholder buys 7 percent stake in Whole Foods Austin American-Statesman Billionaire investor Burkle bets on Whole Foods MarketWatch all 22 news articles

Thomas, McNerney & Partners Promotes Three Members of Its ... PR Newswire (press release), NY - 7 hours ago Thomas, McNerney & Partners is a health care venture capital firm with approximately $600 million under management, focused on investing in life science and ...

Invesco Fund Loss Stirs Investor Fears Wall Street Journal - 31 minutes ago By DIYA GULLAPALLI 'Stable-value" investment funds have been one of the last havens in employee-retirement accounts. But one, advised by money manager ...

Appleseed Fund Ranked by Lipper as Top Performing Midcap Value ... CNNMoney.com - 12 hours ago "Since the Appleseed Fund's inception, we've shown it's possible to outperform the market by investing in companies with strong sustainability records and ...

New T. Rowe Price mutual fund eyes global investment Bizjournals.com, NC - Jan 7, 2009 T. Rowe Price Group Inc. is launching a new mutual fund seeking reward amid the risks of global fixed-income investing. The Strategic Income Fund will ...

Telegraph.co.uk

Learning from Madoff's Ponzi scheme WKOW-TV.com, WI - 7 hours ago Another important lesson from the Madoff Ponzi scandal is that investing money successfully also requires some homework on your part. "If you're investing ... Video: Congress Sounds Off Against SEC in Madoff Affair AssociatedPress Congress Demands SEC Speed Madoff Inquiry to Improve Oversight Bloomberg Re-defining Risk: 5 Investment Rules for 2009 Midas Letter BusinessWeek - Chicago Tribune all 2,717 news articles

Orlando-based CNL Financial to launch real estate investment trust Orlando Sentinel, FL - Jan 7, 2009 Orlando-based investment giant CNL Financial Group Inc. is planning to launch a new real estate investment trust investing in commercial property globally, ... CNL, Macquarie Form New Global REIT GlobeSt. com all 5 news articles