Reading Between The Lines In Annual Proxy Statements

Upper Saddle River, N.J. - May 11, 2005 - Now that a large number of the proxy statements for public companies with fiscal years ending December 31, 2004 have been issued, those of us that scrutinize them for a living, as well as those that have invested in those companies, have an opportunity to analyze their executive pay packages in detail. With all of the attention on Corporate Governance and how to improve the level of transparency and insure that a strong relationship exists between pay and performance, these statements provide for interesting reading.

Many comb through these filings with the intent of learning if the compensation is reflective of the recent trends towards "pay-for-performance". In reality, does the compensation accurately reflect the company's financial performance? And does it make sense? We also are interested in learning how companies are reacting to the recent and anticipated changes in tax, accounting rules, and related legislation and the extent to which those changes are affecting executive compensation design.

With this in mind, we have been reading various recent filings, which when analyzed, still leaves some doubt if the companies are being as open and straight forward as we have all hoped for. Unfortunately, there is still a tendency for companies to use ambiguous, unclear language. In some instances, the linkage to performance is still questionable. The key is to read what has been presented in a very careful way, taking into consideration what is said, and in some instances, what is not said. Some examples from a recent proxy issued by a large company provide evidence of why it is important to read and interpret them very carefully:

"Our policy is to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation payments to (Top Management) under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder (Section 162(m)). Our shareholders have approved our incentive plans designed and administered to qualify compensation awarded thereunder as "performance-based". We may, however, authorize payments to (Top Management) that may not be fully deductible if we believe such payments are in our shareholders' interests."

This means that the programs are in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code §162(m); however, and it is a big HOWEVER, they may not qualify for exemption under the one million dollar cap, and therefore would not be deductible for tax purposes. We find it quite a stretch to see how that is in the shareholder's interest, since a non-deductible expense reduces the company's profitability.

"(Top Management) pay is compared to (Key Sales Management) pay to ensure appropriate internal relationships are achieved."

While internal equity and hierarchical relationships are important in this company's situation, Key Sales Management consists of some very highly compensated sales types that may actually push up the Top Management pay, if the company tries to maintain internal equity. The reality is that top salespeople/producers can make huge amounts, but it is based on their individual performance achievement, and therefore it may be more than the amount that would be paid to corporate officers. Trying to maintain an artificial differential may therefore not be warranted, nor in the best interests of the shareholders.

"(The CEO) participates in several defined benefit pension plans, including some unfunded executive plans?.The amount estimated?.is?.not subject to deductions for Social Security or other offset amounts."

Most large companies have some form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP), which provides non-qualified retirement benefits that are over and above those allowed by government regulations. The standard in designing these plans, which are typically very generous and have a time rather than performance commitment, is that other company-sponsored retirement programs, 401(k) matches, and Social Security would offset the benefits that are provided. Although in the scheme of things, the lack of an offset to these extra benefits may not be a large cost, it is still a hidden extra benefit that should be quantified and disclosed.

"As described above, in contrast to compensation in prior fiscal years, we did not ascribe a value to (the CEO's) restricted stock units based on a 25% discount from fair market value of the common stock to compensate for the vesting characteristics and transfer restrictions on the restricted stock units."

At first read, this seems to make sense, but after multiple readings, we still aren't sure what this means; have the restricted shares been discounted or not? This is an example of ambiguous and confusing language, which companies should work to avoid.

The bottom line is that while many companies are becoming better and more open at responding to regulatory and shareholder demands within their public disclosures, more work is necessary to have complete transparency. In the meantime, let the reader be wary.

Compensation Resources, Inc. provides compensation and human resource consulting to mid-size and Fortune 500 clients as well as public, private, family-owned and emerging companies. CRI specializes in Executive Compensation, Salary Administration, Performance Management, Sales Compensation, and expert witness services. Our reference library boasts over 4,800 surveys.

Latest News


guardian.co.uk

Microsoft's Ballmer to CES: keep investing in tech despite ...
Scientific American - 10 hours ago
Las Vegas , NEV. -- In his first ever CES keynote, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer yesterday acknowledged the tough economic times, but urged companies not to ...
Microsoft: the year ahead ComputerWeekly.com
Microsoft releases Windows Server 2008 R2 beta VNUNet.com
Windows 7 beta available worldwide on Friday AFP
TechFlash - G4 TV
all 1,247 news articles

The Money Times

The Best Investment Values in a Decade
Motley Fool - 9 hours ago
These days, we're presented with what Ron Muhlenkamp a few months ago called "the best investment values we've seen in a decade." Obviously, the market has ...
You Are About to Make a Bad Investment Motley Fool
The Flight to Safety Could Burn You Motley Fool
Wednesday's Biggest Stock Stars Motley Fool
Motley Fool - Motley Fool
all 146 news articles

Wealth Bulletin

How to avoid a Madoff fund
San Francisco Chronicle,  USA - 1 hour ago
Feeder-funds (hedge funds or funds that do all their investing through another fund) and funds-of- funds sold investment services to individuals, ...
The Financial Services Industry’s Free Lunch Asia Sentinel
Fund-of-Hedge Funds Lacked Technology to Avoid Madoff Losses Advanced Trading
D Bank declined offers to invest with Madoff Financial Times
all 13 news articles

Dividend.com

Billionaire investor places next supermarket bet
MarketWatch - 5 hours ago
Yucaipa's investment funds have been aggressive buyers of Whole Foods shares since Nov. 24, spending a net $98 million to amass the stake. ...
Activist shareholder buys 7 percent stake in Whole Foods Austin American-Statesman
Billionaire investor Burkle bets on Whole Foods MarketWatch
all 22 news articles

Thomas, McNerney & Partners Promotes Three Members of Its ...
PR Newswire (press release), NY - 7 hours ago
Thomas, McNerney & Partners is a health care venture capital firm with approximately $600 million under management, focused on investing in life science and ...

US investment in IT would create jobs, group says
ITworld.com, MA - Jan 7, 2009
by Grant Gross A US$30 billion investment by the US government in broadband, health IT and smart energy grids would create or retain nearly a million jobs, ...
New ITIF Report Documents How $30 Billion IT Stimulus Package ... eGov monitor
$30B IT Stimulus Will Create Almost 1 Million Jobs Slashdot
all 32 news articles

Invesco Fund Loss Stirs Investor Fears
Wall Street Journal - 34 minutes ago
By DIYA GULLAPALLI 'Stable-value" investment funds have been one of the last havens in employee-retirement accounts. But one, advised by money manager ...

Appleseed Fund Ranked by Lipper as Top Performing Midcap Value ...
CNNMoney.com - 12 hours ago
"Since the Appleseed Fund's inception, we've shown it's possible to outperform the market by investing in companies with strong sustainability records and ...

New T. Rowe Price mutual fund eyes global investment
Bizjournals.com, NC - Jan 7, 2009
T. Rowe Price Group Inc. is launching a new mutual fund seeking reward amid the risks of global fixed-income investing. The Strategic Income Fund will ...

Telegraph.co.uk

Learning from Madoff's Ponzi scheme
WKOW-TV.com, WI - 7 hours ago
Another important lesson from the Madoff Ponzi scandal is that investing money successfully also requires some homework on your part. "If you're investing ...
Video: Congress Sounds Off Against SEC in Madoff Affair AssociatedPress
Congress Demands SEC Speed Madoff Inquiry to Improve Oversight Bloomberg
Re-defining Risk: 5 Investment Rules for 2009 Midas Letter
BusinessWeek - Chicago Tribune
all 2,717 news articles

Resources